I ran some tests on the developmental build of WordPress 2.2 and the developmental version of Inline Ajax Page functions beautifully.
I originally planed to release INAP 2.3 (yes, it deserves its own number) the same time WordPress 2.2 came out, but since WordPress 2.2 has been pushed forward INAP 2.3 will probably be released by the end of the month. Some of the newest features include JQuery support, working pagination, and threaded comments.
Yes. For now…
Don’t be afraid to touch the WP files if you can use the full potentials of this plug-in.
You gonna have lots of users.
That is none professional opinion
It is actually a good thing to leave the WP files alone because it makes it much easier when new versions of wordpress come out. Sometimes features need to wait or get “hacked in” through back-door means, but all-in-all the plugin system allows you to do anything.
I’m not a programmer.
You know better
But I think that hooking such a plug-in which can show and hide everything you could imagine is giving much slower performance than implementing it in the core.
I see this work as possibility for the visitor to interface the visited page by his/her own taste.
Even more. You could use it the way
Surprisingly enough…*pats self on the back*…it only slows it down a little, and the loss of users due to bundling my own WordPress version would be staggering. The only way to effectively do it would be to fork WordPress (start my own version), but I don’t have nearly enough time to do that.
That is one of my goals. The actual implementation of this is easy, but it just takes time that could be better spent on features of the plugin itself. (Which as an aside, can now take the place of ten or so different plugins.)
The YUI library works similarly to the prototype, Scriptaculous, JQuery, and TW-Sack libraries which are already built into the plugin and control the basic AJAX functionality.
Other than that I’m not quite sure what you mean. Jack Slocum’s work is very different than mine in that he is building a Javascript library comparable to JQuery and Prototype etc., but I’m building a program that integrates WordPress with a Javascript library to improve functionality. Although, that said, my plugin currently uses only the most base features of the libraries.
Feedback is always a good thing, it lets me know what people want. Case-in-point, individual options for users has been something I have wanted for a long time, but no one else asked for them, so they got pushed to the back burner.
I know that your work must not be compared with Jack Slocum’s work, but they already asked him to implement AJAX.
Why not we to ask you to implement some cool YUI features
No joking
OK, serious.
I’m not trying to convince you to make your own INAPed WP, but if you have to put everything that we want, it might make you change your mind.
For now, it will be nice if I can open a link from my weblog with INAP.
Something like:
<a href="http://mysite.com/picture.jpg" rel="nofollow">See the graphics</a>
Or similar code in my site bar opens page in the right(main) DIV
Or I can show and hide mi side bar.
Or let say, …I’ll tell you next time
I don’t know why the “rel” in the code box (above) appeared as “nofollow”
I wanted to be “INAP”.
WordPress does that automatically to all links in comments.
Now you got my point
Unfortunately that is kinda outside the thrust of the plugin, but it wouldn’t be too hard to do.
This comment is actually not comment but plead to all INAP users:
Friends, please if you like and you use INAP, put a link to http://anthologyoi.com/ in your weblog.
The more people know about it, the more users INAP is gonna get.
The more users it has, the closest is the day when theme creators will make INAPed themes and save us time for installation and configuration.
So, Please, put in your weblog link to this web site.
It is the least you could do for this great plug-in.
Now that I officially support the library, I can support the installation of INAP on that theme.