Take a look at the following stats and let me know if you see anything odd.
| Summary by Month | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month | Monthly Totals | KBytes | Visits | Pages | Files | Hits | ||||
| Feb 2008 | 3769739 | 8427 | 24576 | 121569 | 132159 | |||||
| Jan 2008 | 3634098 | 36357 | 131454 | 429936 | 478043 | |||||
Didn’t notice anything odd? Take a look at the first 4 days of the month below (focus on the bold column.)
| Daily Statistics for February 2008 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day | Hits | Files | Pages | Visits | KBytes | |||||||
| 1 | 12484 | 11167 | 3915 | 1194 | 100.954 | |||||||
| 2 | 14990 | 13412 | 5617 | 1273 | 136.491 | |||||||
| 3 | 41622 | 37873 | 7236 | 2417 | 1.288.875 | |||||||
| 4 | 62827 | 58979 | 7763 | 3544 | 2.242.575 | |||||||
If you noticed, Yah, seriously, but if you didn’t: in two days I used as much bandwidth as the previous months. It turns out that on the SoBe Lizard post I added 5 PNG screenshots to the post. Then I went back to the Super Bowl party. Well, Google found it very quickly, a lot of people searched for it, and the post ranked very high, so that one post got the Google version of the slash-dot effect.
Turns out that each one of those 5 images were about 200KB. It wouldn’t have been a big deal on a normal post, but it meant that each visitor downloaded about a Megabyte of images every page load. (In comparison, the CSS, JavaScript and the HTML files adds up to about 31KB.)
Like I said: blink, blink…woops.
Update: I contacted my host, and asked to buy more bandwidth, and they were kind enough to grant me an extra 3 GB of bandwidth for free. I love this company: I’ve never had an issue with them (unlike most of my previous hosts.)
One must be very careful about the post content, because of the impact it could have on server and bandwidth load.
In Truden Web Site I had about 50 GB difference on a month, coming from a single *.mp3 file.
See August in the image bellow:
Well, I see that no image post is allowed in the comments.
Here is the image: IMAGE
That really hurts. It would have killed my website because I only buy 5GB a month, and I rarely use it all (all the AJAX helps keep costs down.)
megyn kelly sexy picture
prince of persia rival swords walkthrough
alice bell de in kristine wonderland
grams conversion ounces
clay lyric walker
naruto battle arena 2 download
naruto 132 english dub
pics of african braids styles
honda dealer orlando
hawaiian park radventure wate
zac efron porn
kappa footwash pics
kelia moniz gallery
acid stain concrete
amrak 2008 promo codes
lrgò s dead serious hoody
last of the mohicans soundtracks
fraternal order of the eagles
coco austin nude pics
paw prints tattoos
Many thanks for your energy to have put these things together on this website. Michael and I very much valued your insight through your articles over certain things. I understand that you have several demands on your own schedule hence the fact that you actually took as much time like you did to help people like us by means of this article is actually highly appreciated.
dy as an app, which is a great start, but it i
So, one better have installed both AJAXed WordPress and WP-cache
I’ve never used WP-cache at the same time as aWP, so I don’t know if they work together, but if they do, you would get the double benefit because only people who want to read full posts will see them, so you save bandwidth without having to have aWP process every post every time it is loaded.
I’ll try it this weekend and I’ll tell you how it works