This speech was made directly to the people, and although it was made in support of Goldwater, it seems to be a foundation of Reagan’s political career. Reagan went beyond the basic party line that the democrat’s were ruining America, and picked at every fault in the democrat’s plans, he blasted away at all of the programs of the “Great Society”, exposed the gross inaccuracies in the planning and execution of existing programs. He then portrayed Goldwater as a kind and caring individual, who would do anything to help someone in trouble.

Reagan’s portrayal of Goldwater seems to be made to soften the Goldwater image and to help overcome the fears Americans had of the time. Goldwater’s hard conservative stance made him seem like someone who would drop a bomb at the slightest provocation, but Reagan painted a picture of someone who not only wouldn’t drop the bomb in an instance but someone who wouldn’t drop the bomb period. Although the speech only mentions Goldwater a few times and only several sentences talking directly about him, thus making the speech less of a tool to get Goldwater elected but more of a way to get people to start thinking of Republican ideals, while seeing what was wrong with the Democratic party.

Reagan goes into some detail of the programs of the “Great Society” and exposing them for the badly run, money-wasting organizations that they were. He continues drawing many likenesses of the administrations views to Marxism; he gives examples of these with the farmers who were losing their land, and a story of a woman getting a divorce so she could receive more welfare. This has the effect of shocking the listener, and creating a feeling of general disgust as parallels could be drawn with other issues of the day, issues such as the increasing divorce rates, the bankruptcy of farmers, rising cost of basic items.

But the speech failed to get Goldwater elected, because of public perception of Goldwater, and the idea that the “Great Society” actually was working well. Even though the speech failed it did stay in people’s minds as it became increasingly obvious that the “Great Society” had failed, just like the Final Frontier, the Fair deal before it.

Even forty years later this speech is as powerful and up-to-date as when it was first written, the same issues, the same party lines, the only change is the players. Even though this speech was made in ’64 seventeen years before Reagan was elected, this speech was one of the many things that helped him to be elected.

The letter is directed to President Kennedy personally and places all the blame for the situation on Kennedy entirely. Khrushchev paints a picture of an evil America threatening the peaceful communist countries of the world and in a very propagandist maneuver describes communists as hard-working peaceful peasant farmers who want nothing more than pleasant diplomatic relations with their neighbors.

Khrushchev claims that the missiles the Russians sold to Cuba were humanitarian aid and sold to them as a way to defend themselves against the American threat the Cubans were forced to live with daily. Although Khrushchev claims the missiles were humanitarian aid they were in fact a way for him to balance out the American missiles in turkey and to position himself for a Public relations victory that would help to take the pressure off of his failed home economic strategy.

This letter inferred that the ending of the crisis would occur with a promise from Kennedy to not use military force against Cuba, however in his second letter he also demanded the removal of all American missiles from military bases in Turkey. It seems that Khrushchev used his first letter to privately tease the American government with the idea of an easy end, but forced his position with a public demand of a much harder bargain in the end. Kennedy responded with a similar smaller public agreement to not invade Cuba but a larger private deal to remove (or consider removing) the missiles the Americans had in Turkey.

The letter also shows how little Castro actually had to do with the Cuban missile crisis all the deals were worked out by America and Russia without concern for Cuban feelings. Future movies and books such as “Thirteen Days” also minimizes Cuba’s role in the entire situation to that of a pawn. Although this may very well be the correct interpretation of events.

The letters did succeed in helping to end the crisis but even though both sides got what they wanted neither side felt they had won anything. Even though the Cuban missile crises publicly lasted thirteen days according to some documents, the crisis started as far back as late 1959 and ended early in 1963.